Daniel Delacruz, Sr. v. State Bar of California

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 15, 202220-16433California774 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 15 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL DELACRUZ, Sr., No. 20-16433

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:19-cv-03241-LHK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, a California public entity, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Lucy H. Koh, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 15, 2022**

Before: D.W. NELSON, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Daniel Delacruz, Sr., appeals pro se the district court’s orders dismissing his

RICO action against the State Bar of California and other defendants. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissal for failure to state a claim and for lack of jurisdiction. Pirani v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.