Arnulfo Vargas-Cortes v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 15, 202221-70322California378 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MAR 15 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ARNULFO VARGAS-CORTES, No. 21-70322
Petitioner, Agency No. A077-490-813
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Immigration Judge
Submitted March 11, 2022** Portland, Oregon
Before: GRABER, BEA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Arnulfo Vargas-Cortes, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks
review of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) determination that Petitioner failed to
establish a reasonable possibility of persecution or torture if he is removed to
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Mexico. Reviewing the IJ’s decision for substantial evidence, Andrade-Garcia v.
Lynch, 828 F.3d 829, 833 (9th Cir. 2016), we deny the petition.
1. Substantial evidence supports the determination that…