United States v. Jorge Espinoza
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 16, 202221-10159California562 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
MAR 16 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10159
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 4:20-cr-02715-RM-DTF-1 v. 4:20-cr-02715-RM-DTF
JORGE ARMANDO LOPEZ ESPINOZA,
MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Rosemary Márquez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 9, 2022** Phoenix, Arizona
Before: HAWKINS, PAEZ, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Jorge Armando Lopez Espinoza pleaded guilty to smuggling goods from the
United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 554(a). He appeals from the district
court’s judgment accepting that plea and imposing a 46-month sentence. We
affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Page 2 of
1. The district court did not plainly err by accepting…