Steven Baker v. Oregon Mutual Insurance Co.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 16, 202221-15716California503 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 16 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEVEN BAKER, DBA Chloe’s Cafe; No. 21-15716 MELANIA KANG, DBA Chloe’s Cafe, a California general partnership, individually D.C. No. 3:20-cv-05467-LB and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,

MEMORANDUM*

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

OREGON MUTUAL INSURANCE

COMPANY, an Oregon Corporation,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Laurel D. Beeler, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 14, 2022** San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: W. FLETCHER and COLLINS, Circuit Judges, and FEINERMAN,*** District Judge.

Appellants Steven Baker and Melania Kang (“Plaintiffs”) appeal from the

district court’s dismissal of their First Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.