Silvia Perez-Anaya v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 16, 202219-73172California691 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 16 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SILVIA PEREZ-ANAYA, No. 19-73172

Petitioner, Agency No. A206-501-329

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 14, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: BEA, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Silvia Perez-Anaya, a citizen of Mexico, seeks review of a Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision dismissing her appeal of an Immigration Judge

(IJ) order denying her applications for withholding of removal, cancellation of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). In light of the Court’s previous order dispensing with oral argument, Dkt. No. 32, the joint motion to submit the case on the briefs, Dkt. No. 33, is denied as moot.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.