Ifamia Rivera De Canales v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 16, 202218-73177California815 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 16 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IFAMIA DE LOS ANGELES RIVERA DE No. 18-73177 CANALES; et al., Agency Nos. A202-120-333 Petitioners, A202-120-334

A202-120-335

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 11, 2022** Portland, Oregon

Before: GRABER, BEA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Ifamia de Los Angeles Rivera de Canales seeks review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ order denying her and her daughters’ applications for asylum

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and withholding of removal.1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252.

To be eligible for asylum, a noncitizen must establish that “he or she has

suffered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.