Christopher Francis v. Jones Stevedoring Company
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 16, 202220-72747California847 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 16 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHRISTOPHER J. FRANCIS, No. 20-72747
Petitioner, BRB No. 17-0465
v.
MEMORANDUM*
JONES STEVEDORING COMPANY;
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS'
COMPENSATION PROGRAMS,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board
Submitted March 11, 2022** Portland, Oregon
Before: GRABER, BEA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Christopher Francis seeks review of a decision of the U.S.
Department of Labor’s Benefits Review Board (BRB) affirming an administrative
law judge’s (ALJ) award of disability benefits pursuant to the Longshore and Harbor
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 901–950. The parties are familiar with
the facts, so we do not recount them here. We have…