Yenny Sanchez Martinez De Domi v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 17, 202219-72782California1,556 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 17 2022

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

YENNY MARICELA SANCHEZ MARTIN No. 19-72782 DE DOMINGO, AKA Yenny Maricela Sanchez Martinez de Domingo; ASTRID Agency Nos. A209-008-324

LUDIANA DOMINGO SANCHEZ, A209-008-325

Petitioners, MEMORANDUM* v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted May 12, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: NGUYEN and COLLINS, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF,** District Judge.

Petitioners Yenny Maricela Sanchez Martin de Domingo (“Sanchez

Martin”) and her minor daughter Astrid Ludiana Domingo Sanchez, citizens and

natives of Guatemala, petition for review of the order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“BIA”) upholding the denial by the immigration judge (“IJ”) of their

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.