Nimesh Patel v. Facebook, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 17, 202221-15553California900 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 17 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: FACEBOOK BIOMETRIC No. 21-15553

INFORMATION PRIVACY LITIGATION,

D.C. No. 3:15-cv-03747-JD ------------------------------

NIMESH PATEL; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

and

FACEBOOK, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

v.

DAWN FRANKFOTHER; CATHY

FLANAGAN,

Objectors-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California James Donato, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 17, 2022 Honolulu, Hawaii

Before: HAWKINS, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. This appeal stems from a class-action suit against Facebook for allegedly

violating the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act for collecting user data

without permission. The district court rejected a $550 million settlement before

approving a $650 million settlement resolving the class claims, then…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.