Nesly Carpio-Batres v. Merrick Garland

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 17 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NESLY MARIELA CARPIO-BATRES; No. 17-71235

ANDERSON DAVID RAMIREZ-CARPIO,

Agency Nos. A208-447-788 Petitioners, A208-447-789

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 15, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, GOULD, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Nesly Carpio-Batres and Anderson Ramirez-Carpio seek review

of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision dismissing Petitioners’ appeal

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). from denial of asylum and withholding of removal by an Immigration Judge (IJ).

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing the factual findings in…