Hardeep Singh v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 17, 202221-70289California2,147 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 17 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HARDEEP SINGH, No. 21-70289

Petitioner, Agency No. A200-993-518

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 7, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: LUCERO,*** IKUTA, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Memorandum joined by Judge IKUTA and Judge VANDYKE; Dissent by Judge LUCERO

Hardeep Singh (Singh) petitions for review of the Board of Immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Carlos F. Lucero, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation. Appeals’ (BIA) January 28, 2021, affirmance of the Immigration Judge’s (IJ)

decision denying his claims for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.