Aracely Hernandez v. Robert Snider
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 17, 202220-35014California547 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MAR 17 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ARACELY HERNANDEZ, No. 20-35014
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-00624-SI
and
MEMORANDUM*
TERESA TORRES; GLORIA SELEEN,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ROBERT SNIDER, Dr.; S. SHELTON, Dr.; D. BROWN,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael H. Simon, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 17, 2022** San Francisco, California
Before: WALLACE, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Oregon prisoner Aracely Hernandez appeals the district court’s judgment in
this action for federal civil rights violations and related state law claims.