Allyson Drozd v. Jeffrey McDaniel

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 17, 202221-35584California393 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 17 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALLYSON DROZD, No. 21-35584

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-00556-HZ

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JEFFREY MCDANIEL, individually,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

CITY OF PORTLAND; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Marco A. Hernandez, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 10, 2022 Portland, Oregon

Before: GRABER, BEA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Allyson Drozd appeals from a jury verdict for Defendant-

Appellee Jeffrey McDaniel on Drozd’s claim that McDaniel retaliated against Drozd

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. in violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution. Because the parties are

familiar with the facts, we do not recount them here, except as necessary to provide

context for our ruling. We review de novo whether verdict forms were legally

erroneous.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.