In re Antonio R.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 17, 2022B314389MCalifornia5,688 words

Opinion

Opinion

Feuer, J.

Filed 3/17/22 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

In re ANTONIO R., a Person B314389 Coming Under the Juvenile (Los Angeles County Court Law. Super. Ct. No. 18CCJP06892)

LOS ANGELES COUNTY

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

AND FAMILY SERVICES,

(NO CHANGE IN THE Plaintiff and Respondent, APPELLATE JUDGMENT)

v.

ASHLEY R.,

Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT:

The above-entitled opinion filed on March 16, 2022 is modified as follows: On page 14, the second sentence in the first full paragraph starting with “Because” and ending immediately before footnote 7 is replaced with the following sentence: Because the Department’s duty to inquire of a child’s extended family members is imposed by California law, “we may not reverse unless we find that the error was prejudicial.”

There is no change in the appellate judgment.

PERLUSS, P. J. SEGAL, J. FEUER, J.

2 Filed 3/16/22 (unmodified opinion)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.