In re Harper

I.

FACTS2

“[Petitioner] and his codefendant Anthony Brown . . . lived at a trailer park in

Rubidoux. Brown was 28. [Petitioner] was 16 but told everyone at the trailer park he

was 19. Brown was the dominant one in the relationship. Sometimes he beat

[petitioner], leaving him black and blue. At the time of the crime, he was trying to get

legal custody of [petitioner].

“Melissa Rogers was also a resident of the trailer park.

“Victim Jamaloddin Doroudi owned and operated the 99 Cent Store in Rubidoux.

He was known to keep large amounts of cash in his wallet. [Petitioner] and Brown were

2 On the court’s own motion, we take judicial notice of the records and nonpublished opinions in petitioner’s prior appeals: People v. Brown et al. (Jan. 7, 2004, E032616) [nonpub. opn.], People v. Harper (June 14, 2016, E063475) [nonpub. opn.], and People v. Harper (Mar. 19, 2020, E073615) [nonpub. opn.]. (Evid. Code, §§ 452, 459; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(b).) We quote the statement of facts from People v. Harper, supra, E063475, this court’s 2016 opinion in a postjudgment appeal from the initial denial of petitioner’s request to be resentenced pursuant to Miller v. Alabama (2012)…