People v. Ming CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 18, 2022B306503California11,498 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/18/22 P. v. Ming CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE, B306503

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. YA095989) v.

TUNG MING,

Defendant and Appellant. __________________________________

THE PEOPLE, B307448

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. YA095989) v.

DARRYL LEANDER HICKS, JR.,

Defendant and Appellant. APPEALS from judgments of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Hector M. Guzman and Amy N. Carter, Judges. Affirmed as to Defendant and Appellant Tung Ming. Affirmed and remanded with directions as to Defendant and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.