Zhongwen Tang v. Merrick Garland
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ZHONGWEN TANG, AKA Ken Chan, No. 17-71471 AKA Andrew Tang, AKA Zhong Tang, Agency No. A070-041-799 Petitioner,
v. MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 15, 2022** Las Vegas, Nevada
Before: RAWLINSON and BENNETT, Circuit Judges, and COGAN,*** District Judge.
The Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirmed the Immigration Judge’s
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Brian M. Cogan, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. (“IJ”) denial of Petitioner Zhongwen Tang’s application for withholding of removal.