Thrasio, LLC v. Boosted Commerce, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202221-55621California432 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 18 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

THRASIO, LLC, No. 21-55621

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 2:21-cv-01337-CBM-SK v. 2:21-cv-02422-CBM-SK

BOOSTED COMMERCE, INC.;

BOOSTED ECOMMERCE, INC., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellants,

and

CHARLES CHANARATSOPON,

Defendant.

THRASIO, LLC, No. 21-55622

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 2:21-cv-01337-CBM-SK v. 2:21-cv-02422-CBM-SK

CHARLES CHANARATSOPON,

Defendant-Appellant,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. and

BOOSTED COMMERCE, INC.;

BOOSTED ECOMMERCE, INC.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Consuelo B. Marshall, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 11, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, S.R. THOMAS, and McKEOWN,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.