Meredith Callahan v. Peopleconnect, Inc.

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 18 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MEREDITH CALLAHAN; LAWRENCE No. 21-16040 GEOFFREY ABRAHAM, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly D.C. No. 3:20-cv-09203-EMC situated,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, MEMORANDUM*

v.

PEOPLECONNECT, INC., a Delaware Corporation,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 11, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, THOMAS, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Defendant PeopleConnect, Inc. (“PeopleConnect”) appeals from the district

court’s order denying their motion to compel arbitration of Plaintiffs’ privacy-

related claims. We affirm. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 16. We

review an order denying a motion to compel arbitration de novo. Rittmann v.

Amazon.com, Inc., 971 F.3d 904, 909 (9th Cir.…