Mark Kleinsasser v. Progressive Direct Ins. Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202221-35351California969 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARK KLEINSASSER, individually and as No. 21-35351 the representative of all persons similarly situated, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-05499-BHS
Plaintiff-Appellant,
MEMORANDUM*
v.
PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE
COMPANY; PROGRESSIVE MAX
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Benjamin H. Settle, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 9, 2022 Seattle, Washington
Before: NGUYEN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Mark Kleinsasser appeals from the district court’s judgment in favor of
Progressive Direct Insurance Company and Progressive Max Insurance Company
(collectively, “Progressive”). Specifically, Kleinsasser argues that the district court
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. erred in making the following three rulings: (1) the court had jurisdiction under the