Mark Dickerson v. City of Portland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202220-36121California589 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MAR 18 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARK DICKERSON, No. 20-36121
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-01126-SB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
CITY OF PORTLAND; MULTNOMAH
COUNTY; MATT JACOBSEN; JOHN
DOES, 1-15,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Stacie F. Beckerman, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 18, 2022 ** San Francisco, California
Before: WALLACE, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff Mark Dickerson appeals pro se from the district court’s summary
judgment in favor of Defendants City of Portland (City), Multnomah County
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (County), Officer Matt Jacobsen, and fifteen John Does. Dickerson brought this
civil rights action and related Oregon claims alleging that he was…