Jona Duikoro v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202218-71842California499 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JONA SEGATI DUIKORO, No. 18-71842

Petitioner, Agency No. A208-968-322

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 16, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, GOULD, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Jona Segati Duikoro, a native and citizen of Fiji, petitions for review of a

decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an immigration

judge’s denial of Duikoro’s application for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the United Nations Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1). We review the agency’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.