Javier Pineda Salgado v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202219-72350California393 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAVIER PINEDA SALGADO, No. 19-72350

Petitioner, Agency No. A070-928-353

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 11, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Javier Pineda Salgado, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) decision affirming the asylum officer’s negative

reasonable fear determination. Salgado claims that the IJ deprived him of his right

to counsel by conducting portions of the reasonable fear hearing without his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). attorney. Because Salgado failed to exhaust his claim, we lack jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.