Elipdio Ramirez-Dorantes v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202217-72513California1,081 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELPIDIO RAMIREZ DORANTES, AKA No. 17-72513 Elipdio Ramirez Dorantes, AKA Elpidio Dorantes Ramirez, Agency No. A087-747-721

Petitioner,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 15, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, GOULD, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Elpidio Ramirez Dorantes (“Ramirez”), a citizen and native of Mexico,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

denying his second motion to reopen his removal proceedings. We have

jurisdiction under § 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1252.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See FED. R. APP. P. 34(a)(2)(C).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.