A. A. v. County of Riverside

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202220-55960California1,235 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

A. A., a minor, by and through her guardian No. 20-55960 ad litem, and all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 5:14-cv-02556-VAP-SP

v.

MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a public entity; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Virginia A. Phillips, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 8, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and ROSENTHAL,*** District Judge.

After filing this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 putative class action, named plaintiff A.A.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Lee H. Rosenthal, Chief United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation. settled her individual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.