E.H.

People v. E.H.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 18, 2022E072463NCalifornia5,302 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/18/22 (3/1/22 mod order & unmodified opinion except for privacy redactions per 3/1/22 mod order attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

COURT OF APPEAL -- STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE, E072463

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super.Ct.Nos. INF1500253 &

INF1500502)

v. The County of Riverside E.H. et al.,

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

Defendants and Appellants. AND DENYING PETITION FOR

REHEARING

[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] _______________________________________

THE COURT

The petition for rehearing is denied. The opinion filed on February 22, 2022 and modified on March 1, 2022, is modified as follows:

On page 13, first paragraph, eliminate the sentence starting with “In other words,” as well as the citation that follows.

On page 16, last paragraph, delete the second and third sentences and replace with the following sentence: “First, the People did not prove that the predicate offenses commonly benefitted Barrio Dream Homes.”

Except for the modification, which doesn’t affect the judgment, the opinion is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.