Labor Commissioner of the State of Cal. v. Archilles CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 21, 2022A160658California2,833 words

Opinion

Opinion

Petrou, J.

Filed 3/21/22 Labor Commissioner of the State of Cal. v. Archilles CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

LABOR COMMISSIONER OF THE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

Plaintiff and Respondent, A160658 v. PHILLIP ACHILLES, ET AL., (San Francisco City & County Super. Ct. No. CGC-18-571050) Defendants and Appellants.

Appellants Phillip Achilles, Theos Fedro Holdings LLC (“Theos Fedro Holdings”), and American Airporter Shuttle (“AAS”) (collectively the “Achilles Defendants”) contend the trial court erroneously entered judgment against them in favor of respondent Labor Commissioner of the State of California (“Labor Commissioner”) after the Labor Commissioner successfully moved the court to enforce the settlement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.