People v. Jensen CA2/7

Discussion, add this sentence to the end: Sanchez testified, “[W]hen I reviewed the incident, I observed Mr. Jensen running out of the garden exit with the power tools.” On page 14 in the second paragraph of section B.1. of the Discussion, delete this sentence: Next, Jensen was “running out of the garden exit with power tools.”

On page 17 in the last paragraph of section B.3. of the Discussion, replace these sentences: In addition, the footage showed Jensen “running out of the garden exit with power tools.” The jury could have inferred Jensen’s consciousness of guilt.

with:

In addition, according to Sanchez, the footage showed Jensen “running out of the garden exit with power tools.” The jury, which saw the video, could have inferred Jensen’s consciousness of guilt from his movement in the parking lot to his accomplice’s car.

Appellant’s petition for rehearing is denied.

There is no change in the appellate judgment.

PERLUSS, P. J. FEUER, J. IBARRA, J. (Assigned)

2 Filed 2/28/22 P. v. Jensen CA2/7 (unmodified opinion)

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or…