Jose Reyes Vasquez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 21, 202220-73409California492 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 21 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE LUIS REYES VASQUEZ, No. 20-73409

Petitioner, Agency No. A098-658-367

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of an Immigration Judge

Submitted March 11, 2022** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, PAEZ, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Jose Luis Reyes Vasquez (“Petitioner”) seeks review of the

Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) concurrence with the finding of the Department of

Homeland Security (“DHS”) that Petitioner did not have a reasonable fear of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). persecution or torture following the reinstatement of the prior removal order. We

deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Petitioner did not

establish a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.