Joaquin Alvarado-Alvarado v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 21, 202216-73315California976 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 21 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOAQUIN ALVARADO-ALVARADO, Nos. 16-73315 AKA Joaquin Alvarado, 17-71138

Petitioner, Agency No. A072-009-938

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 16, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, GOULD, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Joaquin Alvarado-Alvarado (“Petitioner”), a native and citizen of El

Salvador, petitions for review of two decisions of the Board of Immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Appeals (“BIA”). In the first, the BIA dismissed Petitioner’s appeal of the

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of

removal, and special rule cancellation of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.