Citlaly Guzman Dominguez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 21, 202217-70772California636 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 21 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CITLALY GUZMAN DOMINGUEZ; No. 17-70772

YOSHUA GUZMAN DOMINGUEZ,

Agency Nos. A201-026-098 Petitioners, A206-677-958

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 17, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: CHRISTEN and BRESS, Circuit Judges, and LYNN,*** District Judge.

Citlaly Guzman Dominguez and her son Yoshua (collectively, “petitioners”),

citizens of Mexico, petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Barbara M. G. Lynn, Chief United States District Judge for the Northern District of Texas, sitting by designation. decision dismissing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.