Yubao Wang v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 22, 202216-70769California1,018 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 22 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YUBAO WANG; NAITONG JIANG; No. 16-70769

YINGZE MENG,

Agency Nos. A205-776-260 Petitioners, A205-776-261

A205-776-262

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 18, 2022** Las Vegas, Nevada

Before: KLEINFELD, D.M. FISHER,*** and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Yubao Wang, Naitong Jiang, and Yingze Meng, are a family of

natives and citizens of the People’s Republic of China. Wang, the lead respondent

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable D. Michael Fisher, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation. before the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.