Rebeca Guzman v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 22, 202216-72951California553 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 22 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

REBECA ELIZABETH GUZMAN, No. 16-72951

Petitioner, Agency No. A099-049-519

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 16, 2022** Las Vegas, Nevada

Before: KLEINFELD, D.M. FISHER,*** and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Rebeca Guzman argues that the Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”) wrongly affirmed the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) adverse credibility

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable D. Michael Fisher, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation. determination. Guzman also argues that the BIA wrongly rejected the particular

social group that she proposed to show…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.