Gregory Goods v. David Baughman

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 22, 202220-15365California330 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 22 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GREGORY GOODS, No. 20-15365

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-00732-JAM-EFB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

DAVID BAUGHMAN, Warden; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Gregory Goods appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force

and deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Gregg v. Haw. Dep’t of Pub. Safety,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 870 F.3d 883, 886 (9th Cir. 2017)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.