Gregory Goods v. David Baughman
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 22, 202220-15365California330 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 22 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GREGORY GOODS, No. 20-15365
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-00732-JAM-EFB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
DAVID BAUGHMAN, Warden; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Gregory Goods appeals pro se from the district
court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force
and deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Gregg v. Haw. Dep’t of Pub. Safety,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 870 F.3d 883, 886 (9th Cir. 2017)…