Emmanuel Roy v. Pioneer Human Services

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 22, 202220-36079California605 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 22 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EMMANUEL ROY, No. 20-36079

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00235-RMP

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PIONEER HUMAN SERVICES;

SPOKANE RESIDENTIAL REENTRY

CENTER; DAN SIGLER; CARLOS

SOLORZA; SUSAN JOHNSON-

CONNORS,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Rosanna Malouf Peterson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 22, 2022 **

Before: WALLACE, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Emmanuel Roy appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment and its

order denying remand of his action against Pioneer Human Services, Spokane

Residential Reentry Center, Dan Sigler, Carlos Solorza, and Susan

Johnson-Connors (hereafter “defendants”) to the Spokane County…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.