Emmanuel Roy v. Pioneer Human Services
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 22, 202220-36079California605 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MAR 22 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EMMANUEL ROY, No. 20-36079
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00235-RMP
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PIONEER HUMAN SERVICES;
SPOKANE RESIDENTIAL REENTRY
CENTER; DAN SIGLER; CARLOS
SOLORZA; SUSAN JOHNSON-
CONNORS,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Rosanna Malouf Peterson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 22, 2022 **
Before: WALLACE, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Emmanuel Roy appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment and its
order denying remand of his action against Pioneer Human Services, Spokane
Residential Reentry Center, Dan Sigler, Carlos Solorza, and Susan
Johnson-Connors (hereafter “defendants”) to the Spokane County…