Edward Tidwell v. Cshp One Lp
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 22, 202220-16413California384 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 22 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EDWARD C. TIDWELL, No. 20-16413
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-01368-VC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
CSHP ONE LP; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Vince Chhabria, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Edward C. Tidwell appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act and state
law. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a
dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)). Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1112 (9th Cir. 2012). We affirm.