David Wit v. United Behavioral Health

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 22, 202220-17363California1,995 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

MAR 22 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID WIT; et al., Nos. 20-17363 21-15193 Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. 3:14-cv-02346-JCS

LINDA TILLITT; MARY JONES,

Intervenor-Plaintiffs- MEMORANDUM* Appellees,

v.

UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH,

Defendant-Appellant.

GARY ALEXANDER, on his own behalf Nos. 20-17364 and on behalf of his beneficiary son, Jordan 21-15194 Alexander; et al., D.C. No. 3:14-cv-05337-JCS Plaintiffs-Appellees,

MICHAEL DRISCOLL,

Intervenor-Plaintiff- Appellee,

v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Joseph C. Spero, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted August 11, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: CHRISTEN and FORREST, Circuit Judges, and ANELLO,** District Judge. Partial Concurrence by Judge FORREST.

Defendants appeal the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.