Wendell O'Neal v. Terri Albertson
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
MAR 23 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WENDELL DWAYNE O’NEAL, No. 20-16892
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-03025-JAD-DJA
v.
MEMORANDUM*
TERRI ALBERTSON, Director; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Wendell Dwayne O’Neal appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2012). We
affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court properly dismissed O’Neal’s federal…