Wendell O'Neal v. Terri Albertson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 23, 202220-16892California470 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

MAR 23 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WENDELL DWAYNE O’NEAL, No. 20-16892

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-03025-JAD-DJA

v.

MEMORANDUM*

TERRI ALBERTSON, Director; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Wendell Dwayne O’Neal appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2012). We

affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court properly dismissed O’Neal’s federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.