Vincent Solomon v. Ines Castaneda

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 23, 202219-15219California297 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 23 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VINCENT U. SOLOMON, AKA Vincent No. 19-15219 Urain Solomon, D.C. No. 1:15-cv-01801-DAD-JDP Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

INES CASTANEDA; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

A. BANKS; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Vincent U. Solomon appeals pro se from the district

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional

violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse

of discretion a dismissal for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.