United States v. Martin Cisneros

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 23, 202221-10226California496 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 23 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10226

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:14-cr-00044-LRH-WGC-9 v.

MARTIN CISNEROS, AKA Moose, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Martin Cisneros appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion

for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. “[W]e review § 3582(c)(1) sentence

reduction decisions for abuse of discretion,” United States v. Aruda, 993 F.3d 797,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 799 (9th Cir. 2021), and we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.