United States v. Jorge Rojo

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 23, 202220-15708California341 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 23 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-15708

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 2:16-cv-01440-LDG v. 2:12-cr-00216-LDG-VCF-

JORGE ROJO,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Lloyd D. George, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Jorge Rojo appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Reviewing de novo, see United States v. Hill, 915 F.3d

669, 673 (9th Cir. 2019), we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Rojo contends that his conviction and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.