United States v. Frank Goldstein

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 23, 202217-16187California356 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 23 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-16187

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 2:16-cv-01449-JAD v. 2:10-cr-00525-JAD-PAL-

FRANK PHILLIP GOLDSTEIN,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

The stay of this action, entered on July 27, 2021, is lifted.

Frank Phillip Goldstein appeals from the district court’s order denying his

U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Reviewing de novo, see United States v. Hill,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.