United States v. Arnaldo Torteya

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 23, 202221-10186California283 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 23 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10186

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:17-cr-00306-JCM-VCF-5 v.

ARNALDO SANCHEZ TORTEYA, AKA MEMORANDUM*

Elroncoluna,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Arnaldo Sanchez Torteya appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 96-month sentence for racketeering

conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d). Pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Sanchez Torteya’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). are no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.