James McCurdy v. Randy Thomas
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 23, 202221-15090California354 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 23 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JAMES CLAYTON McCURDY, No. 21-15090
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-01736-TLN-CKD
v.
MEMORANDUM*
RANDY THOMAS, C/O,
Defendant-Appellee,
and
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION;
et al.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). California state prisoner James Clayton McCurdy appeals pro se from the
district court’s summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force and deliberate indifference
claims. We have jurisdiction under 28…