Ella Horn v. Experis US Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 23, 202220-17067California541 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 23 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELLA W. HORN, No. 20-17067

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00212-JAM-CKD

v.

MEMORANDUM*

EXPERIS US INC., a Manpower Brand Company,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Ella W. Horn appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

her employment action alleging violations of Title VII and California law. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). Lyon v. Chase Bank USA, N.A., 656 F.3d

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 877, 883 (9th Cir. 2011). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.