Ella Horn v. Experis US Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 23, 202220-17067California541 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 23 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ELLA W. HORN, No. 20-17067
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00212-JAM-CKD
v.
MEMORANDUM*
EXPERIS US INC., a Manpower Brand Company,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Ella W. Horn appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
her employment action alleging violations of Title VII and California law. We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). Lyon v. Chase Bank USA, N.A., 656 F.3d
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 877, 883 (9th Cir. 2011). We…