People v. Pantoja CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 24, 2022A162591California3,358 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Filed 3/24/22 P. v. Pantoja CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A162591

v. JUAN PANTOJA, (Solano County Super. Ct. No. FCR349721) Defendant and Respondent.

Defendant Juan Pantoja filed a motion to suppress evidence of a firearm found on his person when he was patted down during a traffic stop. The trial court granted defendant’s motion and then dismissed the case. The District Attorney appeals. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In January 2020, the Solano County District Attorney filed a one-count felony complaint charging defendant with possession of a firearm by a felon (Pen. Code,1 § 29800, subd. (a)(1)). The next month, defendant filed a motion to suppress evidence…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.