Campbell

Campbell v. Landais CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 24, 2022E076537California3,609 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/24/22 Campbell v. Landais CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

MONTY CAMPBELL,

Plaintiff and Appellant, E076537

v. (Super.Ct.No. EAPPS1900168)

ADAM LANDAIS, OPINION

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Tara Reilly, Judge.

Affirmed.

Monty Campbell, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Adam L. Landais, in pro. per., for Defendant and Respondent.

Plaintiff and appellant Monty Campbell and defendant and respondent Adam L.

Landais are embroiled in a dispute involving property lines, common walls and

trespassing. Campbell filed a “Request for Elder or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.