Zack Coryellbattle v. City of Maricopa

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 24, 202221-15362California576 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ZACK CORYELLBATTLE, No. 21-15362

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-01386-DLR-JZB

and

MEMORANDUM*

GAYLA CORYELLBATTLE,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF MARICOPA; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Zack Coryellbattle appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal and state law violations stemming from his

arrest. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo.

Gordon v. County of Orange, 888 F.3d 1118, 1122 (9th Cir. 2018) (summary

judgment); Resnick…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.