William Bell v. County of Maricopa
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 24, 202220-16600California243 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 24 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WILLIAM LEE BELL, No. 20-16600
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-04809-MTL-JFM
v.
MEMORANDUM*
COUNTY OF MARICOPA; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Michael T. Liburdi, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Arizona state prisoner William Lee Bell appeals pro se from the district
court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging an access-to-
courts claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a
dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2000). We affirm.