United States v. Steven Reychler
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 24, 202221-30225California309 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 24 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30225
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:18-cr-00004-DLC-
v.
MEMORANDUM*
STEVEN FRANCIS REYCHLER,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Dana L. Christensen, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Steven Francis Reychler appeals from the district court’s order denying his
motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, see United
States v. Keller, 2 F.4th 1278, 1281 (9th Cir. 2021), we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Reychler contends that he is entitled to compassionate…